eqRequests

Every request starts from the same guided intake process across the organization. A nurse manager and a lab director each get a path that makes sense to them, and what comes out is consistent either way.

Requesters write the justification in their own words. The reasoning that made the case compelling survives all the way to committee instead of being flattened into a line item.

Supporting files attach directly to the request. Nothing has to be re-gathered from an email thread when the request finally comes up for review.

Approvals route through your organization’s own governance structure. Each approver sees the request when it is genuinely their turn, rather than being copied on everything.

Dollar and criteria-based rules trigger the right approval path on their own. Nobody has to remember which asks need which approvals at which dollar figure.

Urgent requests move through a defined path, not a workaround. Moving quickly on an urgent replacement does not cost you the record of who approved it and why.

Requests that overlap with related projects get surfaced early. Two departments asking for the same equipment becomes one conversation instead of two competing line items.

Requesters see exactly where their request stands. Fewer status chases for the committee, and far less uncertainty for the department waiting on an answer.

Every decision, reallocations included, stays with the request. When a decision is questioned a year later, the reasoning is still there to read rather than reconstructed from memory.